Thursday, December 18, 2008

Determining Responsibility

This post discusses the Case Study: Who Is Responsible

I would like to say 7/10 resignations are because of bad immediate boss. But I have no statistics to prove it. When dealing with any situation, seat of the pant estimates or feeling doesn't work. In any case I am not big believer of exit interviews. They are supposed to provide truthful information. The logic being the person who is leaving has no axe to grind and so hopefully will provide you with the true state of affairs in the company, from his/her point of view, in any case. However, there is another factor to be considered: unless the person who is leaving the company is absolutely agitated, s/he would like to leave the company in as pleasant manner as possible. So the first advise is that do not get over exited with what you hear at exit interviews. I am not saying what you hear at exit interviews is incorrect; only that it may not be the whole truth.

And in any case, why wait for the exit interviews to get information. It is necessary to establish processes in the company so that grievances could be aired by employees before it is too late. The HR performs a vital role here.

Coming back to the case study, before calling the Project Manager for discussion, there are a couple of quick checks I would do.

Who are the persons who are submitting their resignations?
How many years of experience do they have?
How recent is this phenomenon of resigning? Did this start fairly recently or has been happening for some time now?
What sort of skill set is going out of the company?
Are they easily replaceable?
Are these resignations really damaging your company?
Where did they stand in the

Next I would also talk to the employees who have not resigned. (This needs to be done keeping the Project Manager in confidence. Inform him that you will talk to some members of his team and that the summary will be shared.)

Why are they still with us?
What changes would they like to see?
What is the impact on them of such resignations?
In their opinion what could change. (Don't put words in their mouth).

I have just listed a few questions of the many you should be asking.

Now that you have enough data sit with your HR and PM to understand the data and come to conclusion. It is bad idea to confront your Project Manager. Always find solutions WITH him/her. Sift through the data to get information. The convert information into actionable steps. Since you and your PM are in a problem solving mode - together - chances are that the PM himself/herself will address his/her behavioural issues. If not, then emphasise the importance of short-term versus long-term goals of the company. Getting a project done on time is short term. Retaining skilled employees is vital for long term.

Finally share the information and actions with all other Project Managers and all employees. This is very important.

Now, what if shove comes to push. You may have to tell the PM to modify behaviour. That is perfectly fine. Provided you have enough data to put it across. Sitting on judgment based on one exit interview is not enough data.

2 comments:

KABEER ANBAN said...

Many of the answers depend on the nature of business the company handles. Needless to say the size of the company too is a parameter to decide whether resignations are matter of concern or not.

Firstly,if the company is mainly a Marketing company one can expect exodus. When a senior person leaves he pulls out some more of his (ex) team mates.

Secondly, if the company is large the number of resignations tend to increase though one can monitor on the basis of employees turnover.

I do agree when a new boss arrives in order to feel secure he surrounds himself with Yes Men which leads to resentments among honest and loyal peers. It may snowball to effect exit of good people too.

The role of HRD in assessing the prevailing morale is crucial. If rightly (?) done the periodic performance appraisals and counseling should help in this matter.
I agree with you that sharing of right information at all levels is very important for the team members to realize what their role is in the whole act.

Ultimately it is the CEO or Chairman who set the company's culture.

"yathaa Raja thathaa Praja"

Yogi said...

I liked your case study, which is very effective to all.